Paste a URL. Get a 0–100 score for how ready your site is to be read and quoted by ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini — with a grade and the exact fixes that move the needle.
Free. No sign-up to see your score.
Some sites want to be everywhere AI looks. Some want to be invisible. Bigger teams need both — page by page.
You want ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini to read, trust and cite you. See how visible you are — and the exact fixes that lift it.
You'd rather AI stayed away — for licensing, privacy, competitive or legal reasons. Verify you're actually walled off. (robots.txt is only a request — we check whether it holds.)
Insights public, client work private. Regulated and client-serving firms need some pages open to AI and others locked down. A whole-site exposure map shows what's leaking — and what's needlessly hidden.
People increasingly ask an assistant instead of scrolling a results page. If AI can't read, understand and trust your content, it quietly reaches for a competitor.
We fetch the page exactly as an AI crawler would and inspect the signals that decide whether it gets read.
Six weighted checks roll up into a single 0–100 score and an A–F grade you can act on.
Get the three highest-leverage fixes first, then the full signal-by-signal breakdown.
Every score is built from these, each weighted by how much it moves real visibility.
Can GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot and Google-Extended actually fetch the page? Block them and nothing else counts.
JSON-LD schema that tells engines exactly what your page is and who published it.
Is the real content in the HTML, or hidden behind JavaScript a crawler never runs?
Is the content shaped like an answer — summaries, clear headings, quotable passages?
A named author, dates and citations engines use to decide whether to trust and quote you.
HTTPS, titles, canonical, Open Graph, sitemap — the basics that signal a maintained site.